One of the great pleasures of my young technology marketing career was getting invited to the Microsoft campus in Redmond, WA in 2003 and taking a guided tour of their “House of The Future.” For those who aren’t familiar with it, the “house” is a mock two-story house in one of their buildings, complete with a landscaped entrance, living room, kitchen, two bedrooms and 2 ½ baths. The purpose of the house is to demonstrate their vision of how people will be living in the near future, not in a Disney animatronics way, but rather in a format that enabled you to get hands-on and live the part of someone in the next decade. As I get closer and closer to the 10-year mark, I’ve been thinking more and more about the predictions that the house had and evaluating just how much has come true. The truth is that most of it has come true . . . just not in the way they envisioned . . . and none of it was done by Microsoft. The purpose of the house was to show how a day-to-day life could truly be augmented and improved by technology. The tech could be broken down into four segments: calendar, connectivity, tracking, and interface. The house would track the movement of almost everything that came through its doors through RFID chips implanted in everything. Walmart was a huge proponent of this technology and the prediction was that as Walmart does, everyone else will follow. Take groceries as an example. Once a gallon of milk was put in the fridge, the house would track its expiration date and notify you when you needed more. If you put it in the trash, it would also know that you were out and it could automatically order more. If you put it on the counter, it could tell you all of the things you could make with it via LED readouts imprinted on the surface. The house would know your schedule via your Outlook calendar and could warn you when, say, your daughter has a soccer game the next day and you haven’t washed her uniform since her last match. It could help you plan your financial life as you could receive bills, pin them to a board, and have the house pay them with a single swipe. It could enhance your personal life by enabling your friends and family to take pictures and upload them to web-enabled picture frames hanging around your house. Most of this came true. Actually, this came true and much, much more, but not because of anything Microsoft did and definitely not in the way they envisioned. The structure of the house they created mirrored Microsoft’s philosophy on technology. Just as they create software that runs on hardware made by another company, which then makes other software programs possible, the house assumed an evolution in technology would take place that brought innovation from many different organizations together to create a single system for the household to use. This technology would reside in the products we buy, in the walls of the house, in the computers running it, in the appliances that were installed, and in data centers at remote locations. The reality that eventually came to be part of our collective lives packed this technology and the same impacts on our lives into a single device that resides in our pockets at all times. Of course I am talking about our mobile devices and the vertical integration of this technology. Brilliant move by Steve Jobs? Eh, I don’t know that I would give him that much credit, but placing it into our hands makes it much more accessible along the age and socioeconomic spectrum, as well as gives us the ability to bring it with us wherever we go. I’m very happy to see that it ended up this way as it enabled the birth of mobile marketing, and the rest was history.